arrow_backXD Is The Melody I

Voting Insights — XD Is The Melody I

Key Takeaways info_outline
Most Generous: Liz (avg 1.92)
Most Selective: Lauren Seebacher (avg 0.79)
Most Aligned: Dia Yang (r 0.564)
Most Contrarian: Pax Dorian (r 0.11)
Most Consistent: Ricky (σ 0)
Chattiest Voter: Charles Collins (avg 93.5 chars)
Widest Tastes: Lauren Seebacher (H 4.198)
What this shows: headline patterns of voter behavior in this league.
How to read it: alignment “r” is correlation with final totals (closer to +1 = nearer to consensus).
Why it’s useful: it surfaces taste archetypes—great for storytelling and badge ideas.
How we calculate these (click to expand)
  • Generosity / Selectivity — average points per vote.
  • Alignment — average Pearson r vs. final round totals (0 for unscored tracks).
  • Consistency — σ of per-round avg points given (lower = steadier).
  • Chattiest — average comment length (characters).
  • Widest Tastes — Shannon entropy over points distribution by recipients.
Per-Voter Metrics info_outline
What this shows: a comprehensive statline for every voter.
How to read it: high “Avg Pts/Vote” = generous; low “Consistency σ” = steady; “Alignment r” compares taste to the league outcome; “Taste Entropy” = how evenly they spread points.
Why it’s useful: useful for spotting roles (“steady judge,” “contrarian tastemaker”) and patterns.
file_downloadExport CSV
Voter Rounds Votes Avg Pts/Vote Generosity Z Consistency σ Alignment r Unique Recipients Taste Entropy Comment Rate Avg Comment Len
Lauren Seebacher 13 179 0.79 -1.399 0.200 0.326 21 4.198 0.447 54.4
Adam Rose 13 141 1.01 -0.654 0.222 0.275 20 3.957 0.191 30.8
Jeff Bayson 13 139 1.02 -0.620 0.145 0.298 20 4.041 0.151 89.9
Alex Romel 13 135 1.05 -0.519 0.299 0.220 21 4.107 0.415 41.3
Cathy 13 133 1.07 -0.451 0.091 0.320 20 4.003 0.015 29.0
Shannon 13 133 1.07 -0.451 0.281 0.374 19 3.998 0.429 64.6
Tarin Gessert 12 128 1.03 -0.587 0.216 0.397 19 3.916 0.391 40.0
Roscoe 12 125 1.04 -0.553 0.108 0.320 20 4.044 0.064 40.8
ChileanIggy 13 122 1.16 -0.146 0.217 0.360 21 4.087 0.049 51.0
Amber Klootwyk 11 114 1.07 -0.451 0.311 0.351 20 4.107 0.307 62.0
Tad Gospodarek 9 92 1.09 -0.383 0.089 0.349 21 4.028 0.000 0.0
Russell Houghtaling 9 88 1.11 -0.316 0.141 0.233 19 4.022 0.023 9.0
Charles Collins 10 85 1.29 0.294 0.364 0.398 20 4.058 0.141 93.5
Chaloma 12 72 1.83 2.123 0.656 0.383 20 3.920 0.000 0.0
Bea Hoffman 6 61 1.18 -0.079 0.454 0.438 18 3.952 0.148 32.0
Becca Setala 9 55 1.78 1.954 0.358 0.278 16 3.481 0.055 35.0
Angela 5 52 1.04 -0.553 0.112 0.525 16 3.732 0.000 0.0
Ricky 3 34 1.00 -0.688 0.000 0.254 17 3.976 0.029 2.0
Liz 4 25 1.92 2.428 1.291 0.461 14 3.454 0.120 52.7
Pax Dorian 2 22 1.09 -0.383 0.141 0.110 15 3.741 0.000 0.0
Dkubasa 2 16 1.50 1.005 0.566 0.250 11 3.257 0.000 0.0
Dia Yang 2 15 1.33 0.430 0.126 0.564 11 3.204 0.067 44.0

Tip: click a voter to open their competitor page for deeper context.

Top Reciprocity Pairs info_outline
What this shows: the strongest two-way point exchanges between pairs.
How to read it: “A → B” totals the points A gave B; “B → A” is the reverse.
Why it’s useful: reveals alliances, appreciation loops, or shared taste.
file_downloadExport CSV
Pair A → B B → A Total
Alex Romel ↔ Becca Setala 28 16 44
Adam Rose ↔ Tarin Gessert 22 19 41
Shannon ↔ Alex Romel 20 12 32
Chaloma ↔ Adam Rose 16 13 29
Chaloma ↔ Charles Collins 16 11 27
Cathy ↔ Tad Gospodarek 15 12 27
Chaloma ↔ Jeff Bayson 15 11 26
Shannon ↔ Tarin Gessert 12 13 25
Shannon ↔ Roscoe 12 13 25
Adam Rose ↔ Jeff Bayson 13 12 25
Adam Rose ↔ Roscoe 9 15 24
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Jeff Bayson 16 8 24
ChileanIggy ↔ Jeff Bayson 16 7 23
Shannon ↔ Cathy 9 14 23
Roscoe ↔ Amber Klootwyk 7 16 23
Cathy ↔ Jeff Bayson 9 14 23
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Tarin Gessert 11 11 22
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Alex Romel 9 13 22
Adam Rose ↔ Lauren Seebacher 11 10 21
Roscoe ↔ Tarin Gessert 10 11 21
ChileanIggy ↔ Tarin Gessert 14 6 20
Shannon ↔ Lauren Seebacher 10 10 20
Shannon ↔ Becca Setala 7 13 20
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Charles Collins 13 7 20
Cathy ↔ Tarin Gessert 6 14 20
Alex Romel ↔ Amber Klootwyk 7 13 20
Amber Klootwyk ↔ Charles Collins 12 8 20
ChileanIggy ↔ Charles Collins 8 11 19
Adam Rose ↔ Alex Romel 9 10 19
Adam Rose ↔ Cathy 12 7 19
Roscoe ↔ Tad Gospodarek 10 9 19
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Amber Klootwyk 9 10 19
Jeff Bayson ↔ Charles Collins 17 2 19
ChileanIggy ↔ Roscoe 12 6 18
ChileanIggy ↔ Alex Romel 10 8 18
Chaloma ↔ Amber Klootwyk 10 8 18
Chaloma ↔ Roscoe 4 14 18
Chaloma ↔ Cathy 10 8 18
Roscoe ↔ Lauren Seebacher 9 9 18
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Russell Houghtaling 8 10 18
Cathy ↔ Charles Collins 9 9 18
Tad Gospodarek ↔ Amber Klootwyk 9 9 18
Charles Collins ↔ Tarin Gessert 9 9 18
ChileanIggy ↔ Adam Rose 9 8 17
Shannon ↔ Amber Klootwyk 7 10 17
Shannon ↔ Tad Gospodarek 6 11 17
Chaloma ↔ Bea Hoffman 6 11 17
Roscoe ↔ Alex Romel 6 11 17
Lauren Seebacher ↔ Cathy 8 9 17
ChileanIggy ↔ Chaloma 8 8 16

Note: self-voting is disallowed; reciprocity covers cross-voting only.

Most Polarizing Rounds info_outline
What this shows: rounds with the most spread between top and bottom tracks.
How to read it: higher σ ⇒ bigger disagreements; click a round to see the breakdown.
Why it’s useful: great for narratives (“The Great Debate Round”) and playlist ideas.
file_downloadExport CSV
RoundDispersion σ (Final Points)
Namesake 3.942
Dear Maria, Count Me In 3.723
Time Capsule 3.438
Note to Your Younger Self 3.381
Double Theme 3.089
ROY G BIV 2.963
Uncovered 2.949
Tasty Tunes 2.885
XD Celebration 2.847
Limewire 2.813
Roll Credits 2.784
Creative Flow 2.733
Graduation Day - from Charles 😃 2.586

Method: standard deviation of final points (requires ≥2 tracks).